Advertisement


 

Last Update:
Tuesday, May 6, 2008 5:32 PM PDT

News

CLASSIFIEDS

SPECIAL SECTIONS

Advertisement


Map the Valley


Subscriber/
Reader Services

Subscribe Now
Contact Customer Service

$73,500 tax firm to be considered by City Council

Kingsburg's city council members seem to be in favor of collecting more money from out-of-town guests through an increase in the tax at local motels. But there is some concern over the price tag to hire a consulting firm to help get the measure passed.

The city is considering placing a measure on the November ballot that would increase Kingsburg's transient occupancy tax from 8 percent to 12 percent -- an increase that could mean an additional $20,000 a year into the city's General Fund, 60 to 70 percent of which supports the police and fire departments.

Although the money is funneled into the city's coffers, it is paid by those staying in motels and hotels, not by a city's residents. Still, residents must vote for the tax to enact it.

On Wednesday night, the city council will vote on whether it would be advantageous to pay The Lew Edwards Group $73,500 to help get the ballot measure passed for the increased tax. The Oakland-based firm specializes in passing revenue measures throughout California and the Central Valley.

Officials believe that the money will be recovered quickly if the tax is approved, but in the meantime, the city council wants to ensure that city funds are not being spent unnecessarily.
"I'm not excited at all about spending the money, but I look at it as an investment because I know it will cover itself," said Councilman Bruce Blayney.

Mayor Pro Tem Paul Kruper agreed with Blayney that he hates to spend the money, but said that once the new motels that are slated to come in finally open next year, the city will easily recoup the money.

"I think one of the good reasons to spend the money is to see if it would pass," Kruper said, referring to the public opinion survey which will help The Lew Edwards Group determine if the ballot measure stands a chance of voter approval.

Councilman David Karstetter said that when the city put a planned growth initiative on the ballot several years ago, it passed with an overwhelming 83 percent without any type of formal campaign.

"But of course this is about taxes, and there's always a negative component with that," Karstetter said.

He went on to say that he is unsure how the council will decide to handle the issue, because while he sees the passage of the tax as an important issue, he thinks that the cost of hiring The Lew Edwards Group "seems to be quite a bit."

The Lew Edwards Group is proposing that the typical project costs would be as follows: $25,000 for public opinion research, $20,000 for two direct mailings, $3,500 for out-of-pocket costs, and a $25,000 consulting fee.

"I think we're probably going to have to run an information campaign since it's a tax," Karstetter said. "We want to make sure the people are properly educated."

Blayney and Kruper agreed that public education is crucial because the word "tax" makes voters nervous. Both said that if the tax doesn't pass the first time, it would be even harder to pass it the second time around.

Blayney said that rather than assuming that the Edwards group is the only option, he would like to see the city look into some competitive bids.

City Manager Don Pauley told the council during their last meeting that educating the voting public on what a transient occupancy tax would mean for them is essential in getting the measure to pass. He said that voters need to realize that the tax will be collected from visitors to Kingsburg -- not from the residents. He said that while he appreciates the council's desire to minimize the city's costs, he considers some of the costs "necessary and unavoidable."

Kingsburg currently has only two motels -- the Swedish Inn and the Tav Cam, but that will soon change.

By 2009, there should be three new motels in the business park adjacent to Kmart and Sonic. It is anticipated that a Fairfield Inn and a Microtel will break ground by the end of this year, and once those are completed, a Hawthorne Inn will follow. A fourth motel is being planned for acreage next to the Tav Cam as well.

The city council meeting will take place at 7 p.m. on Wednesday, May 7 in the council chambers.

POST A COMMENT

 

Kingsburgrecorder.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed, particularly if they are posted after normal office hours.

We reserve the right to remove comments in total that violate our code of conduct. We will not post reader comments containing racial, religious or personal attacks, slander, profanity, or commercial product promotions.

For more information please read our Terms of use, and Rules of the Road.

 

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   

Kingsburg Resident wrote on May 7, 2008 9:44 AM:

" The Kingsburg City Council thinks they need to spend $73,500 to "help" us make up our minds about a motel tax increase. Maybe they need to see how fast we can make up our minds about electing new Council Members! "

Disturbed wrote on May 7, 2008 10:19 AM:

" What bothers me the most is that the council seem to not want to hire the consultant according to this article. So, then, who is pushing for the consultant? The smells fishy to me! "

Concerned wrote on May 7, 2008 11:58 AM:

" Do you know how many envelopes and stamps $25,000.00 can purchase, do the survey yourselves with volunteer help and save the $73,500.00 the first mass mailing and it's responses will answer your question. Save yourselves $43,500.00 in the process. "

Sven wrote on May 8, 2008 7:52 PM:

" $73, 500 consulting fee divided by $20,000 per year tax revenue is 3.65 years. That means the City (meaning US) pays the consultant with funds from somewhere else. It takes nearly 4 years before the intended benificiaries see a dime. That certainly is clear thinking on behalf of our city fathers. The Lutefisk fumes must have clouded their judgement. Perhaps it is time for a change. "

HIREDVOTER wrote on May 9, 2008 12:37 AM:

" COUNT ME IN AS ONE VOTE FOR THE TAX. LET'S GO FOR A 15% TAX SINCE WE ARE NOT GOING TO PAY IT. IF ONE DAY I NEED TO STAY AT THE MOTEL/HOTEL I WILL NOT COMPLAIN BECAUSE I WILL HAVE VOTED FOR IT. HEY,FOR $20,000 I'LL GO DOOR TO DOOR AND EXPLAIN IT TO THE REGISTERED VOTERS. NO WEEKENDS "

Not a gambler wrote on May 10, 2008 12:54 PM:

" I think 4 years is too long for a break-even point. The $20,000/year projection is probably inflated to make the City's decision appear better. The City Council should wait until the proposed hotels are built, before counting their chickens... In the current economy, there's no guarantee they will be built. What is certain is the Consultant expense (by the way, what was cut from the budget to pay for this? Who needs police anyway... a dozen recent burglaries are no big deal). What's going on at City Hall? Time for change! "

Selma Citizen wrote on May 15, 2008 12:28 AM:

" If your Council is anything like ours, your chickens were counted years ago. Your City Manager will get rich and your Police Department will soon began occurring lay-offs. Citizens, you need to step up now and let your voices be heard! You dont want to be compared to Selma! "

Thanks Recorder wrote on May 17, 2008 3:03 PM:

" This kind of reporting is long over-due. Thanks for keeping us informed. Sure wish your office was still open here. If you keep reporting these kind of stories I will get over it.

Good job Recorder! "



LOCAL VIDEO


Advertisement


MORE LOCAL NEWS

Lemoore:

Coalinga:
XML_Parser: no element found at XML input line 1:0

Selma:

Kingsburg: